Dignitas proceeds to the OC semi-finals

 

#31 noac

01/12/2003 @ 21:22

minime is a better nick I think than jagged. Suits u better. Oh no me being dragged down to the muddy level of behaving again. Bugger.

 

#32 noac

01/12/2003 @ 21:35

would it had been more or less lame to play on a 32 server and Dkh wouldnt had to spawn at all basically?

 

#33 Aza

01/12/2003 @ 23:28

Whats even lamer is to switch a player to the opposite side to scout the positions of the opposite team, then disconnect and blame it on a "mistake". If DkH plays with the fire, they're bound to get burned. Simple as that.

 

#34 nosen

02/12/2003 @ 06:50

In order to force DkH to spawn, with standard drop of 32players DkH could win by not spawning, with the ALLOWED 64player server DkH would have lost by not spawning, therefor they had no choice but to spawn, DkH still tried to hide far behind their HQ, instead of beeing as agressive as last time. GG DkH thanks for a good match.

 

#35 noac

02/12/2003 @ 08:25

giliathion, read the postings below, there are atleast 6 answering to your question. A good tip is to do this in advance.

 

#36 JocMeister

02/12/2003 @ 09:45

Before this goes out of hand... Yes Jagged posted under false nick since we told everyone in legacy to stay out of this mess. Aparently the "itch" got to bad for him and he did something wrong. It won´t happen again. Atleast not under false nick ;) We will se you in the semi for the best match this season :) Oh and noac, chill man. If you are a member of dignitas try being a bit more...nice? :)

 

#37 Zatarra

02/12/2003 @ 11:30

Apology accepted Joc :) And noac will calm down a bit i think :> /me pours some ice over noac

 

#38 noac

02/12/2003 @ 12:32

JocMeister I cant help it sometimes, my brain just sends me evul and lame things to say. Just ignore me most of the time, that is the best thing really. I dont know what crap will come out of me, or when.

 

#39 noac

02/12/2003 @ 13:00

giliathion please read for instance post #27.

 

#40 n00

02/12/2003 @ 14:40

i know, i know! why won't we all just sit down, think a sec, and notice what others have done already. it's not only pointless to go on with this, but it gets old as well... we won fair, dkh has said already, that they're fine with this. so are we. so should all others be. mmmmkay?

 

#41 cougar

02/12/2003 @ 16:39

let's see this postitive, we never had as many comments as this before :>

 

#42 noac

02/12/2003 @ 16:39

no me want 100 comments! me want it now!

 

#43 Aza

02/12/2003 @ 16:53

Gil, look upon it this way: Dignitas was positive they had the victory in their grasp on 4th round on stalingrad. All of a sudden, one of their players switch sides. People snap, people starts to lose their focus , some extremely suspicious attacks from DkH's side take place a little while after one of their players had a good look upon Dignitas tactical map. All this combined, dont u think it's worth 12 lousy tickets? I do. And it's my sincere belief that Dignitas would of won the game if the DkH player wouldn't have switched side. Now for the 64 player server. I can totally understand why the d´ players wanted to force DkH players to spawn, cuz there aint a point of replaying a map if the other team doesnt even have to spawn in order to win, is it?It must blow especially much if u consider that d´ probably (atleast in my opinion) would have won the game if this side-switching wouldn't have occured. Now, dont u think its the most fair thing to do to ATLEAST force DkH to spawn on that map so Dignitas could have a shot at the victory they were so close to achieve before Black switched side? Well, suck me sideways, but i think a 64 slot server was the best option to go with in a situation like this. Because we all know that DkH is a team that would certainly not spawn if they knew they would win by doing so.

 

#44 m0rax

22/04/2007 @ 16:27

pfff